Durham v. Niffenegger

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided August 25, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-00091·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION DAVID DURHAM, : Case No. 1:18-cv-00091-SJD-KLL Plaintiff : Judge Matthew W. McFarland VS. Magistrate Karen L. Litkovitz DETECTIVE JERRY NIFFENEGGER, ; et. al., Defendants. :

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

The parties, by and through their legal counsel, stipulate and agree to the terms of this Order, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). The parties further agree that the terms of this Agreed Protective Order shall remain in place until further order of the Court. The Court, having reviewed the agreement and stipulation of the parties, finds that good cause supports the entry of such an order and that justice so requires. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Scope. All documents produced in the course of discovery including initial disclosures, all responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and exhibits, other materials that may be subject to restrictions on disclosure for good cause, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), shall be subject to this Order concerning confidential information as set forth below. As there is a presumption in favor of open and public judicial proceedings in the federal courts, this Order shall be strictly construed in favor of public disclosure and open proceedings wherever possible. The Order is also subject to the Local Rules of this District and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on matters of procedure and calculation of time periods.

2. Form and Timing of Designation. A party may designate documents as confidential and restricted in disclosure under this Order by placing or affixing the words “CONFIDENTIAL- SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER?” on the document in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document and that will permit complete removal of the CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER designation. Documents shall be designated “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER?” prior to or at the time of the production or disclosure of the documents. The designation “CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER?” does not mean that the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. 3. Documents Which May be Designated “CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” Any party may designate documents as “CONFIDENTIAL- SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” upon making a good faith determination that the documents contain information protected from disclosure by statute or that should be protected from disclosure as confidential medical or psychiatric information. Public records and other information or documents that are publicly available may not be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 4. Depositions. Deposition testimony shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER?” only if designated as such. Such designation shall be specific as to the portions of the transcript or any exhibit to be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” Thereafter, the deposition transcripts and any of those portions so designated shall be protected as CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER, pending objection, under the terms of this Order.

5. Protection of Confidential Material. a. General Protections. Documents designated “CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” under this Order shall not be used or disclosed by the parties, counsel for the parties, or any other persons identified in 7 5(b) for any purpose whatsoever other than to prepare for and to conduct discovery and trial in this action, including any appeal thereof. b. Limited Third-Party Disclosures. The parties and counsel for the parties shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER documents to any third person or entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)-(5). Subject to these requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review documents that have been designated “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER:” i. Counsel. Counsel for the parties and employees and agents of counsel who have responsibility for the preparation and trial of the action; ii. Parties. Parties and employees of a party to this Order, their insurance carriers, brokers, and their claims investigation and administrative employees reasonably necessary to the evaluation and administration of the claims; ili. Court Reporters and Recorders. Court reporters and recorders engaged for depositions; iv. Consultants, Investigators, and Experts. Consultants, investigators, or experts (hereinafter referred to collectively as “experts”) employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to assist in the preparation and trial of this

action or proceeding, but only after such persons have completed the certification contained in Attachment A, Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to Be Bound; and v. Others by Consent. Other persons only by written consent of the producing party or upon order of the Court and on such conditions as may be agreed or ordered. All such persons shall execute the certification contained in Attachment A, Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to Be Bound. c. Control of Documents. Counsel for the parties shall take reasonable and appropriate measures to prevent unauthorized disclosure of documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” pursuant to the terms of this Order. Counsel shall maintain the originals of the forms signed by persons acknowledging their obligations under this Order for a period of 1 year after dismissal of the action, the entry of final judgment and/or the conclusion of any appeals arising therefrom. d. Copies. Prior to production to another party, all copies, electronic images, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions (hereinafter referred to collectively as “copies”) of documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” under this Order, or any individual portion of such a document, shall be affixed with the designation “CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” if the designation does not already appear on the copy. All such copies shall thereafter be entitled to the protection of this Order. The term “copies” shall not include indices, electronic databases, or lists of documents

provided these indices, electronic databases, or lists do not contain substantial portions or images of the text of confidential documents or otherwise disclose the substance of the confidential information contained in those documents. e. Inadvertent Production. Inadvertent production of any document or information without a designation of “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER?” shall be governed by Fed. R. Evid. 502. Counsel receiving documentation which has been inadvertently produced shall notify producing Counsel immediately upon the discovery of the production and shall return the documents to producing Counsel. Inadvertent production of any document or information without a designation of “CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER?” shall not waive the protections of this Order. 6. Filing of CONFIDENTIAL —- SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Documents Under Seal. This Protective Order does not authorize filing protected materials under seal. No document may be filed with the Court under seal without prior permission as to each such filing, upon motion and for good cause shown, including the legal basis for filing under seal. See Procter & Gamble Co. v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durham v. Niffenegger, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Durham v. Niffenegger (Durham v. Niffenegger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related