Durham v. Mitchell
This text of Durham v. Mitchell (Durham v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6295
MARIAN O. DURHAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARY MITCHELL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:07-cv-03855-MJP)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 24, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marian O. Durham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marian O. Durham seeks to appeal the district court’s
order transferring her petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) to
the district court for the Middle District of Florida. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Durham seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. See In re Carefirst of Md., Inc., 305 F.3d 253,
255, 262 (4th Cir. 2002); Gower v. Lehman, 799 F.2d 925, 927 (4th
Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we deny Durham’s motion to expedite and
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Durham v. Mitchell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-mitchell-ca4-2008.