Durham v. Harris

67 S.E. 668, 134 Ga. 134, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 132
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 23, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 668 (Durham v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durham v. Harris, 67 S.E. 668, 134 Ga. 134, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 132 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

The first item of a will gave to the testator’s widow all his household and kitchen furniture and the rents of his farm during her life. The second item was as follows: “I give and bequeath to each of my daughters, viz., Elizabeth Harris, Talula Jackson, and Anna Foster, four hundred dollars each, and then an equal division of the remainder of my property with my sons, George, James H., Wiley, and Nathan.” The third item provided for the payment of the testator’s debts, and his executor was appointed in the fourth and last item. A petition was filed by the executor, alleging that the widow had died and he had sold the-lands of the estate, and that there was a controversy between the daughters and sons of the testator as to how a given sum remaining in the executor’s hands, after discharging the debts and the payment of $400 to each of the daughters, should be distributed' under the second item of the will, and praying , for direction by the court as to this matter. Held, (1) that the petition presented a proper ease for direction by the court, the meaning of the second item of the will not being so clear as to render unnecessary a construction of this item by the court for the guidance and protection of the executor; (2) that [135]*135tlie court properly construed this item to mean that the “remainder” therein referred to should be equally distributed among the three daughters and the four sons named in the item, but erred in dismissing the

February 23, 1910. Petition for direction. Before Judge Gober. Cobb superior court. December 4, 1908. J. J. Northcutt, for plaintiff. J. Z. Foster, for defendants.

petition upon demurrer. Judgment reversed.

'All the Justices coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Morris
195 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Williams
131 S.E. 911 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 668, 134 Ga. 134, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-harris-ga-1910.