Durham v. Dixon
This text of Durham v. Dixon (Durham v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-0354 _____________________________
BOBBY R. DURHAM,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Fla. Dept. of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
October 2, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
ROWE, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Bobby R. Durham, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Durham v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2024.