Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Durham v. Armstrong

Durham v. Armstrong

181 S.E. 665, 181 Ga. 137, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 43
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1935
DocketNos. 10610, 10614
StatusPublished

This text of 181 S.E. 665 (Durham v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durham v. Armstrong, 181 S.E. 665, 181 Ga. 137, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 43 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

Under tlie evidence tlie jury were not authorized to return any verdict other than that directed by the court. The evidence as a whole required this verdict:

Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent. Tye, Thomson & Tye, for plaintiff in error. W. 8. Northcuti and James B. Childs, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 S.E. 665, 181 Ga. 137, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-armstrong-ga-1935.