Durgin v. Baker
32 Me. 273
This text of 32 Me. 273 (Durgin v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Durgin v. Baker, 32 Me. 273 (Me. 1850).
Opinion
orally.—The contract reserves to each of the parties the largest liberty.. Neither could control the other. Either might terminate the contract at pleasure. It was not .requisite that he should have a reason for it. He cannot, therefore, be required to prove one.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McClure Bros. v. Briggs
58 Vt. 82 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1886)
Finger v. Koch & Schilling Brewing Co.
13 Mo. App. 310 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 Me. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durgin-v-baker-me-1850.