Durgin v. Baker
32 Me. 273
Opinion
orally.—The contract reserves to each of the parties the largest liberty.. Neither could control the other. Either might terminate the contract at pleasure. It was not .requisite that he should have a reason for it. He cannot, therefore, be required to prove one.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durgin v. Baker, 32 Me. 273 (Me. 1850).
32 Me. 273 (Durgin v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McClure Bros. v. Briggs
58 Vt. 82 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1886)
Finger v. Koch & Schilling Brewing Co.
13 Mo. App. 310 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1883)