Durfee v. Heemstreet

1 Wend. 305
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Wend. 305 (Durfee v. Heemstreet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durfee v. Heemstreet, 1 Wend. 305 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Opinion

[306]*306 By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

For a variance between the ac etiam contained in the capias on which the defendant was arrested, and the cause of action set forth in the declaration, this court, in 4 Johns. R. 484, set aside the proceedings as irregular. It is said this is not conformable to the English cases; that the only effect of such variance, according to those cases, is to discharge the bail, whether the proceeding be by bill or original. Without deciding this question, it is enough that this court has a right to regulate its own practice ; and this precise question having been decided in the case alluded to, the court will not depart from the decision there made, The motion is granted with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Fond du Lac v. Bonesteel
22 Wis. 251 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1867)
Ridder v. Whitlock
12 How. Pr. 208 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
M'Farlan v. Townsend
17 Wend. 440 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wend. 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durfee-v-heemstreet-nysupct-1828.