Durfee v. Garvey
This text of 4 P. 377 (Durfee v. Garvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—The certificate of acknowledgment of Maria E. Espinosa, dated July 26, 1877, was fatally defective, and the deed conveyed no title. The evidence given on the trial of the case does not show that the acknowledgment was other than as certified by the officer. Her proper acknowledgment of the deed, subsequent to her conveyance to the defendant, did not cure the defective acknowledgment. The court found that [407]*407Garvey made no representation to said Maria for the purpose of deceiving her, and that she was not deceived.
We see no error.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 P. 377, 65 Cal. 406, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durfee-v-garvey-cal-1884.