Duren v. City of Charlotte
185 S.E. 434, 210 N.C. 824, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 240
Opinion
Plaintiff’s evidence fails to make out a case of actionable negligence against the city of Charlotte. Walker v. Reidsville, 96 N. C., 382, 2 S. E., 74. It is not perceived wherein the defendant omitted to discharge any duty which it owed to the plaintiff. She was not injured by reason of any defect in the street or sidewalk. Haney v. Lincolnton, 207 N. C., 282, 176 S. E., 573. The judgment of nonsuit is correct.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duren v. City of Charlotte, 185 S.E. 434, 210 N.C. 824, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 240 (N.C. 1936).
185 S.E. 434 (Duren v. City of Charlotte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitacre v. City of Charlotte
6 S.E.2d 558 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)