Durdick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Durdick v. State

476 So. 2d 317, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2336, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16235

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 476 So. 2d 317 (Durdick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durdick v. State, 476 So. 2d 317, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2336, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16235 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error and, accordingly, we affirm his conviction. However, we must remand to the trial court because of a clerical error in the court’s written judgment.

Although the jury returned a verdict of guilty of first degree murder and the appellant was orally found guilty of first degree murder, the written judgment recites that he is guilty of second degree murder. The written judgment must not vary from the court’s oral pronouncement. Jackson v. State, 445 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of the error. The judgment and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI