Durden v. State

48 S.E. 315, 120 Ga. 860, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 723
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 9, 1904·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The accused having been convicted of incestuous adultery upon the evidence of the woman with whom he was alleged to have committed the offense, and there having been no sufficient corroboration of her testimony, the verdict was contrary to law and should have been set aside. Yother v. State, 120 Ga. 204.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Evans, J., disqualified. F. S. Saffold, for plaintiff in erroT, cited Ga. R. 52/106; 66/346; 92/584; 110/151 (5); 113/192; 3 Tex. App. 132; 9 Iowa, 582. B. T. Rawlings, solicitor-general, contra, cited Ga. R. 44/215 (4); 52/403 (2); 55/220 (3); 56/356 (4); 73/572; 109/165.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durden v. State, 48 S.E. 315, 120 Ga. 860, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 723 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 315 (Durden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
266 S.E.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Wilkins v. State
101 S.E.2d 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Jennings v. State
79 S.E. 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)