Durden v. State
This text of 32 Ala. 579 (Durden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The right to proceed in this case to a final judgment, by taking a judgment nisi, and by seire facias, is purely statutory, being conferred by section 3492 of the Code. To justify a judgment against a defaulting witness, wbo was summoned to give evidence before the grand jury, the record must affirmatively show a substantial compliance with the statute. — Connolly v. Ala. and Tenn. Rivers R. R. Co., 29 Ala. R. 373, and authorities cited.
The scire facias in this case does not contain enough to justify the judgment rendered. If other facts existed, which make out the regularity of the proceeding, they should have been set forth in a complaint, or declaration. Emanuel v. Ketchum, 21 Ala. 257.
The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Ala. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durden-v-state-ala-1858.