Durden v. Moore

159 S.E. 135, 43 Ga. App. 423, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 399
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1931·No. 21455·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The exception here is to the first grant of a new trial. The verdict was not demanded by the law and the facts of the case; and therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the judgment must be

Affirmed. Lulce, J., concurs.

Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durden v. Moore, 159 S.E. 135, 43 Ga. App. 423, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 399 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

159 S.E. 135 (Durden v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burrus Motor Co. v. Patterson-Pope Motor Co.
179 S.E. 171 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)