Durden v. Moore

159 S.E. 135, 43 Ga. App. 423, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 399
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1931
Docket21455
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 S.E. 135 (Durden v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durden v. Moore, 159 S.E. 135, 43 Ga. App. 423, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 399 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The exception here is to the first grant of a new trial. The verdict was not demanded by the law and the facts of the case; and therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the judgment must be

Affirmed. Lulce, J., concurs.

Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burrus Motor Co. v. Patterson-Pope Motor Co.
179 S.E. 171 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E. 135, 43 Ga. App. 423, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durden-v-moore-gactapp-1931.