Durden v. McWilliams

31 Ala. 206
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 31 Ala. 206 (Durden v. McWilliams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durden v. McWilliams, 31 Ala. 206 (Ala. 1857).

Opinion

WALKEN, J.

— The decision of the majority of this court, in the case of Carew v. Love’s Adm’r, at the present term, bolds, that three years possession, under a loan, does not render the chattels so possessed liable to the debts of the bailee, created before the expiration of the three years possession. This decision is decisive of the question arising upon the charge given by the court. The charge was erroneous, because it authorized the subjection of the slave to the payment of the bailee’s debts created before the expiration of the three years possession, upon the mere ground of that possession.

The questions of evidence, presented in the bill of exceptions, will probably not again arise; and we therefore do not deem it necessary to decide them.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinney v. La Frange
81 So. 2d 903 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1955)
Choctaw Bank v. Dearmon
134 So. 648 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Hill v. Rentz
78 So. 881 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Diamond Rubber Co. v. Fourth National Bank
55 So. 100 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Mathis v. Thurman
143 Ala. 558 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1904)
Butler v. Jones
80 Ala. 436 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ala. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durden-v-mcwilliams-ala-1857.