Durborow v. Shuck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Durborow v. Shuck

724 So. 2d 715, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 756, 1999 WL 34601

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1389

StatusPublished

This text of 724 So. 2d 715 (Durborow v. Shuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durborow v. Shuck, 724 So. 2d 715, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 756, 1999 WL 34601 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

GOSHORN, J.

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

Based on the parties’ motions for rehearing and clarification, and finding no useful purpose for reversing the order appealed given that the final custody hearing is set for less than two weeks hence, the opinion issued December 31,1998 is hereby withdrawn. The order appealed is affirmed with the exception of the portion thereof ordering the father to contribute to the mother’s attorney’s fees. The trial court’s finding that both parties are in need of attorney’s fees precludes imposition of a fee order. Accordingly, the fee portion of the order is reversed and any payments made thereunder are directed to be returned.

[716]*716MOTIONS for REHEARING and CLARIFICATION GRANTED; ORDER AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOSHORN, J.

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

Based on the parties’ motions for rehearing and clarification, and finding no useful purpose for reversing the order appealed given that the final custody hearing is set for less than two weeks hence, the opinion issued December 31,1998 is hereby withdrawn. The order appealed is affirmed with the exception of the portion thereof ordering the father to contribute to the mother’s attorney’s fees. The trial court’s finding that both parties are in need of attorney’s fees precludes imposition of a fee order. Accordingly, the fee portion of the order is reversed and any payments made thereunder are directed to be returned.

[716]*716MOTIONS for REHEARING and CLARIFICATION GRANTED; ORDER AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 So. 2d 715, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 756, 1999 WL 34601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durborow-v-shuck-fladistctapp-1999.