Durante v. Huff
This text of 245 A.D. 832 (Durante v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when a dilapidated building, in which he was gathering wood for his own use, collapsed and fell upon him. Appeal from order dismissing complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial, with the following memorandum; The building was in a dilapidated condition and a menace to life and limb. It was defendants’ duty to warn even a licensee against the imminent danger. As to plaintiff’s knowledge of the danger, there was a question of fact for the jury. The complaint should not have been dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durante-v-huff-nyappdiv-1935.