Durant v. Munford

1913 OK 470, 134 P. 50, 38 Okla. 552, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 413
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 22, 1913·No. 4931·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

HAYES, C. J.

A petition in error and case-made was filed in this .cause on the last day of the statutory period for perfecting appeal from the judgment sought to be reversed. On the same day a summons in error was issued; but it does not appear that this summons- in error, or any alias summons, was ever served upon defendant in error within 60 days after the issuance of said summons in error and the expiration of the statutory period for commencing .a proceeding in error in this court. In fact it does not -appear that any service of summons has ever been had upon defendant in error. Upon the authority of School Dist. No. 39, Kiowa County, v. Fisher, 23 Okla. 9, 99 Pac. 646, and Wedd v. Gates et al., 15 Okla. 602, 82 Pac. 808, the cause should be dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except DUNN, J., absent and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durant v. Munford, 1913 OK 470, 134 P. 50, 38 Okla. 552, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 413 (Okla. 1913).

1913 OK 470 (Durant v. Munford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pioneer Canal Co. v. Akin
192 P. 680 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1920)
Kansas Nat. Bank of Wichita v. Goodner-Horne Co.
1917 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Steele v. Million
1915 OK 771 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Wahl v. White Sewing MacH. Co.
1915 OK 136 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
White Lumber Co. v. Beasley
1915 OK 130 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
In Re Herod's Estate
1914 OK 19 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)