Durant v. Cook

1 How. Pr. 43
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 43 (Durant v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durant v. Cook, 1 How. Pr. 43 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit of merits would not be good, if made for this motion, and as there is no merits sworn to by defendants on this 46] motion, and the plaintiff being regular, the defendants can not be let in on terms.

Decision.—Motion denied with costs, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durant-v-cook-nysupct-1844.