Durango Associates, Inc., and Dnd Corporation v. Reflange, Inc., and Climax Manufacturing Company

925 F.2d 1478, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 388

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Durango Associates, Inc., and Dnd Corporation v. Reflange, Inc., and Climax Manufacturing Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 912 F.2d 1423 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 9, 1991·No. 90-1100·Unpublished

Opinion

925 F.2d 1478

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
DURANGO ASSOCIATES, INC., and DND Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
REFLANGE, INC., and Climax Manufacturing Company,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 90-1100, 90-1230.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 9, 1991.

Before (MARKEY, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.)

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

925 F.2d 1478

Nos. 90-1100, 90-1230.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 9, 1991.

Before (MARKEY, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.)

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Durango Associates, Inc., and Dnd Corporation v. Reflange, Inc., and Climax Manufacturing Company, 925 F.2d 1478, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 388 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Pincite

925 F.2d 1478 (Durango Associates, Inc., and Dnd Corporation v. Reflange, Inc., and Climax Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.