Duran v. Andrew

Missouri Court of Appeals

Duran v. Andrew

295 S.W.3d 183, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330, 2009 WL 3050885

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 22, 2009

DocketED 92731

StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.W.3d 183 (Duran v. Andrew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duran v. Andrew, 295 S.W.3d 183, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330, 2009 WL 3050885 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Andrew (hereinafter, “Andrew”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entering a full order of protection against him pursuant to Section 455.040 RSMo (2000) 1 for abuse or stalking of Janeen M. Duran. Andrew raises one point on appeal, claiming there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate Andrew violated Section 455.010 et seq.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All further references herein are to RSMo (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI