Dural v. State
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
05-SEP-2019
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11:01 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
ROYNES JOSEPH DURAL, II,
Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI#I,
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 09-1-0015)
ORDER DISMISSING CERTIORARI PROCEEDING (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., McKenna, J., Circuit Judge Nacino in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused, Circuit Judge Eddins in place of Pollack, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Castagnetti in place of Wilson, J., recused)
Upon further consideration of the records and files in this case, it appearing that the writ of certiorari herein was improvidently granted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this certiorari proceeding is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 5, 2019. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Edwin C. Nacino /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dural v. State (Dural v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.