Dural v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 2019·No. SCWC-13-0003694·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

05-SEP-2019

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11:01 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ROYNES JOSEPH DURAL, II,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 09-1-0015)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTIORARI PROCEEDING (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., McKenna, J., Circuit Judge Nacino in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused, Circuit Judge Eddins in place of Pollack, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Castagnetti in place of Wilson, J., recused)

Upon further consideration of the records and files in this case, it appearing that the writ of certiorari herein was improvidently granted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this certiorari proceeding is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 5, 2019. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Edwin C. Nacino /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dural v. State, (haw 2019).

Dural v. State (Dural v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.