Duquette v. Cattell
This text of Duquette v. Cattell (Duquette v. Cattell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 05-2387
RANDY DUQUETTE,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
LES DOLECAL, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Circuit Judge, Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
Randy Duquette on brief pro se. Kelley A. Ayotte, Attorney General, and Mary E. Maloney, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.
July 14, 2006 Per Curiam. This pro se appellant appeals from the grant
of summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees. The
district judge essentially found that his constitutional claim was
not ripe for adjudication at this time. After careful review of
the appellate contentions and the district court record, we affirm,
substantially for the reasons given by the district judge in his
Order dated August 29, 2005.
Affirmed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Duquette v. Cattell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duquette-v-cattell-ca1-2006.