Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1996
Docket95-2092
StatusUnpublished

This text of Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank (Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank, (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2092

EUGENIO DUQUESNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE FIDELITY BANK; JIM TURNER, Bank Official; REE GARDNER, Bank Official; KELLY G. HALLMAN, Bank Official; LOUIS C. ROSSER, Sheriff; SOCIAL SERVICES, Harnett County; ELIZABETH MURCHISON, Harnett County Social Services; MARY ANN STUMP, Agent, Harnett County Social Services; RHONDA H. ENNIS, Agent, Harnett County Social Services; JACK D. BRYAN, Agent, Harnett County Social Services; JACK D. BUZZARD, Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-8-5-BR)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugenio Duquesne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank, No. CA-95-8-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 1995; May 2,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duquesne-v-fidelity-bank-ca4-1996.