Home/Supreme Court/Duquesne Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnet

Duquesne Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnet

282 U.S. 830, 51 S. Ct. 89
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 24, 1930
DocketNo. 457
StatusPublished

This text of 282 U.S. 830 (Duquesne Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duquesne Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnet, 282 U.S. 830, 51 S. Ct. 89 (1930).

Opinion

In view of the conflict of decisions appearing since the .former order of this Court, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, granted. The order heretofore entered on October 20,1930, denying the petition for writ of certiorari [831]*831herein is vacated and it is ordered that the petition for writ of certiorari in this case be, and the same is hereby, granted.

Mr. Wm. S. Moorhead for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Young-quist and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Sewall Key, John Henry McEvers, W. Marvin Smith, and Clarence M. Charest for respondent..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 U.S. 830, 51 S. Ct. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duquesne-steel-foundry-co-v-burnet-scotus-1930.