Dupuy v. Dashiell

15 La. 124
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 La. 124 (Dupuy v. Dashiell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dupuy v. Dashiell, 15 La. 124 (La. 1840).

Opinion

Bullard, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale granted at chambers, upon the presentation of authentic evidence of a mortgage on the property ordered to be seized. It appears that the property belonged originally to' Dupuy, who sold to Lesassier, reserving a mortgage ; and that Lesassier sold to the present defendant and appellant, who assumed to pay the plaintiff’s claim.

The clause in the act of sale from Lesassier to Dashiell, upon which this proceeding is founded, is as follows : “ and, whereas, it appears, &c., that the said property is subject to the following mortgages: 1st. One in favor of Marcel Dupuy on the first portion of said land, and on nine of said slaves, for the amount of thirteen thousand and two hundred dollars, and interest, of this debt. The vendor declares that he has paid all the interest and about four thousand dollars. Now, it is agreed that the sum of eleven thousand dollars capital,” &c. Here the copy is so defective, from an omission, that we are compelled to conjecture an assumption on the part of Dashiell to pay. But it is clear and even admitted during the argument, that the order of seizure issued for too [126]*126much according to the evidence before the judge who granted jt. The amount appears to have been left open by the parties for ulterior adjustment, and as the sum due and assumed to be paid, is left doubtful, the plaintiff ought to proceed by ordinary suit.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged, that the order of seizure heretofore granted by the district judge, be rescinded, reversed and annulled, and that the plaintiff pay the costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fontelieu v. Fontelieu
41 So. 120 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 La. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupuy-v-dashiell-la-1840.