Dupuy v. Carrier Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dupuy v. Carrier Corp.

204 A.D.2d 977, 614 N.Y.S.2d 950

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 204 A.D.2d 977 (Dupuy v. Carrier Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dupuy v. Carrier Corp., 204 A.D.2d 977, 614 N.Y.S.2d 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. Where a party fails to comply with the statutory mandate that a summary judgment motion be supported by copies of the pleadings (see, CPLR 3212 [b]), summary judgment should be denied (see, Somers Realty Corp. v Big "V” Props., 149 AD2d 581; Freeman v Easy Glider Roller Rink, 114 AD2d 436). The record in this case is devoid of pleadings. For that reason, Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion for partial summary judgment. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.—Partial Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. Where a party fails to comply with the statutory mandate that a summary judgment motion be supported by copies of the pleadings (see, CPLR 3212 [b]), summary judgment should be denied (see, Somers Realty Corp. v Big "V” Props., 149 AD2d 581; Freeman v Easy Glider Roller Rink, 114 AD2d 436). The record in this case is devoid of pleadings. For that reason, Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion for partial summary judgment. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.—Partial Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 977, 614 N.Y.S.2d 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupuy-v-carrier-corp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack