Dupuy v. California Trust Co.

86 F.2d 997, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 1936
DocketNo. 8133
StatusPublished

This text of 86 F.2d 997 (Dupuy v. California Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dupuy v. California Trust Co., 86 F.2d 997, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920 (9th Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that appellant has failed to file brief as required by rule 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court, and has been notified by the clerk that the matter would be presented to the court for action, and no appearance or response being made, it is ordered that the appeal in this cause be dismissed for failure of appellant to file brief; mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 F.2d 997, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupuy-v-california-trust-co-ca9-1936.