Dupuis v. City of Geneva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dupuis v. City of Geneva

184 A.D.2d 1009

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1992

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.D.2d 1009 (Dupuis v. City of Geneva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dupuis v. City of Geneva, 184 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and finding vacated. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that Supreme Court improperly found that it was undisputed that plaintiff’s corneal scarring in his left eye was not proximately caused by any alleged defects in the goggles distributed and sold by defendants. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, Jr., J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and finding vacated. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that Supreme Court improperly found that it was undisputed that plaintiff’s corneal scarring in his left eye was not proximately caused by any alleged defects in the goggles distributed and sold by defendants. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, Jr., J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupuis-v-city-of-geneva-nyappdiv-1992.