DuPre v. Humphries

113 S.E. 204, 153 Ga. 884, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 187
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 30, 1922
DocketNo. 3386
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 204 (DuPre v. Humphries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DuPre v. Humphries, 113 S.E. 204, 153 Ga. 884, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 187 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Pjsk Curiam.

“ Upon an application for a mandamus to compel the trial judge to certify a bill of exceptions, the merits of the case will not be considered if it he the first bill of exceptions after verdict.” But upon an application for mandamus to compel a judge to sign a second bill of exceptions this court will look into the merits of the case; and having done so in this ease, we find the petition for habeas corpus to be without merit, and consequently deny the writ of mandamus requiring the trial judge to sign the bill of exceptions tendered. Rawlins v. Mitchell, 127 Ga. 24 (55 S. E. 958); Landers v. Cobb, 150 Ga. 80 (102 S. E. 428).

Writ of mandamus denied.

All the Justices concur, except Hill'and Gilbert, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLendon v. Anderson
60 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Wright v. Davis
193 S.E. 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
White v. Hutcheson
154 S.E. 157 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 204, 153 Ga. 884, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupre-v-humphries-ga-1922.