Dupre v. City of Houma

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Dupre v. City of Houma

218 So. 2d 45, 253 La. 329, 1969 La. LEXIS 3122

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 6, 1969

DocketNo. 49646

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 So. 2d 45 (Dupre v. City of Houma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dupre v. City of Houma, 218 So. 2d 45, 253 La. 329, 1969 La. LEXIS 3122 (La. 1969).

Pincite

Opinions

In re: Peter J. Dupre, Jr., Beulah Hebert Dupre and Hebert Dupre and Hebert F. Frederick, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne, 216 So. 2d 576.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

HAMLIN, J., concurs. He is of the further opinion that Art. XI of the petition contains mere conclusions of the pleader. Plaintiffs have not shown how and in what manner they will suffer prejudice, how public funds will be wasted; and how and in what manner they will suffer irreparable injury. BARHAM, J., dissents from the refusal of the writ and will assign written reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Peter J. Dupre, Jr., Beulah Hebert Dupre and Hebert Dupre and Hebert F. Frederick, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne, 216 So. 2d 576.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

HAMLIN, J., concurs. He is of the further opinion that Art. XI of the petition contains mere conclusions of the pleader. Plaintiffs have not shown how and in what manner they will suffer prejudice, how public funds will be wasted; and how and in what manner they will suffer irreparable injury. BARHAM, J., dissents from the refusal of the writ and will assign written reasons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 So. 2d 45, 253 La. 329, 1969 La. LEXIS 3122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupre-v-city-of-houma-la-1969.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack