Dupre v. City of Houma

218 So. 2d 45, 253 La. 329, 1969 La. LEXIS 3122
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 6, 1969·No. No. 49646·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

In re: Peter J. Dupre, Jr., Beulah Hebert Dupre and Hebert Dupre and Hebert F. Frederick, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne, 216 So. 2d 576.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

HAMLIN, J., concurs. He is of the further opinion that Art. XI of the petition contains mere conclusions of the pleader. Plaintiffs have not shown how and in what manner they will suffer prejudice, how public funds will be wasted; and how and in what manner they will suffer irreparable injury. BARHAM, J., dissents from the refusal of the writ and will assign written reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dupre v. City of Houma, 218 So. 2d 45, 253 La. 329, 1969 La. LEXIS 3122 (La. 1969).

218 So. 2d 45 (Dupre v. City of Houma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Settle v. Bossier Parish School Board
93 So. 3d 1284 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)