DuPouey v. United States
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial the customs broker testified that she made the entry herein for Hambro Trading Co. on June 6, 1947; that on June 2 she filed a request for information from the appraiser who stated that he had no current information and that market value should be ascertained from the shipper; that subsequently an amended entry was filed on the basis of information given by the examiner; and that she understood that the figures given by the examiner included the packing charges, but when the examiner made his return, packing was added to the net value. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
25 Cust. Ct. 224 (DuPouey v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.