Dupont v. Goffe

1 S.C. Eq. 143
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided December 15, 1787·Published

Opinion

On motion of Mr. Edward Rutledge, and with consent of Mr. Read, ordered, that C. B. Goife, one of the defendants, have leave of absence for one mouth, notwithstanding the bond given on the writ of ne exeat, but without prejudice to the party complainant on the bail bond,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dupont v. Goffe, 1 S.C. Eq. 143 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1787).

1 S.C. Eq. 143 (Dupont v. Goffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.