duPont v. County National Bank of North Miami Beach

369 So. 2d 443, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14721
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1979·No. No. 78-1574·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this record, the summary final judgment under review is reversed.

There was a triable issue as to whether or not the bank was the holder in due course of a note executed by the appellant, S. Hallock DuPont, Jr., as to the question of whether or not the bank took the note without any notice of a defense thereto. See: A. B. G. Investment, Inc. v. Selden, 336 So.2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Section 673.3-307(3), Florida Statutes (1975).

Therefore, the summary final judgment under review be and the same is reversed, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

duPont v. County National Bank of North Miami Beach, 369 So. 2d 443, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

369 So. 2d 443 (duPont v. County National Bank of North Miami Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
405 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Pioneer State Bank v. Johnsrud
284 N.W.2d 292 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1979)
Schaefer v. State
369 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)