DuPont v. Boshong
8 F. Cas. 109, 1 W.N.C. 378, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1420
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 17, 1875
DocketCase No. 4,184
StatusPublished
This text of 8 F. Cas. 109 (DuPont v. Boshong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DuPont v. Boshong, 8 F. Cas. 109, 1 W.N.C. 378, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1420 (circtedpa 1875).
Opinion
said that this was a very peculiar case, and, without deciding the question of jurisdiction, asked whether some amicable arrangement could not be made between counsel.
Mr. Bullitt suggested that a receiver should be appointed, and gave notice that he would move to that effect next week, and in the meantime agreed that the sale should be adjourned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 F. Cas. 109, 1 W.N.C. 378, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dupont-v-boshong-circtedpa-1875.