Duplantis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Duplantis v. State

554 So. 2d 673, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 118, 1990 WL 1084

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 11, 1990

DocketNo. 89-434

StatusPublished

This text of 554 So. 2d 673 (Duplantis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duplantis v. State, 554 So. 2d 673, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 118, 1990 WL 1084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a departure sentence. Because the court departed from the recommended guideline sentence for the sole reason that the appellant was on probation and again violated the law, it was error to depart from the recommended guideline sentence. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). The sentencing judge is limited to a one-cell bump-up.

SENTENCE VACATED; REVERSED.

DAUKSCH, COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a departure sentence. Because the court departed from the recommended guideline sentence for the sole reason that the appellant was on probation and again violated the law, it was error to depart from the recommended guideline sentence. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). The sentencing judge is limited to a one-cell bump-up.

SENTENCE VACATED; REVERSED.

DAUKSCH, COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 So. 2d 673, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 118, 1990 WL 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duplantis-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack