DuPerow v. Groomes

D.C. Circuit

DuPerow v. Groomes

43 App. D.C. 580, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2658

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 24, 1915

DocketNo. 2787

StatusPublished

This text of 43 App. D.C. 580 (DuPerow v. Groomes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DuPerow v. Groomes, 43 App. D.C. 580, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2658 (D.C. Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It was not error to permit the plaintiff to testify to the fact that he made a memorandum.

The court gave the case to the jury, following the law as laid down in the former opinion.

Error is assigned upon the refusal of an instruction asked by the defendant. This relates to the good faith of Groomes, provided it was shown that he was the agent of DuPerow.

There was no error in refusing the instruction, as it was not supported by the evidence. The question submitted to the jury was one of fact, on which there was a conflict in the evidence. The jury found for the plaintiff.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs. Affirmed„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI