Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 4, 2017·No. 03-17-00140-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 4, 2017

NO. 03-17-00140-CR

Duone Titus-Ray Hairston, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND GOODWIN MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of conviction to delete any reference

to appellant pleading to enhancement paragraphs. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State (Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.