Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State
This text of Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State (Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 4, 2017
NO. 03-17-00140-CR
Duone Titus-Ray Hairston, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND GOODWIN MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of conviction to delete any reference
to appellant pleading to enhancement paragraphs. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.
Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Duone Titus-Ray Hairston v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duone-titus-ray-hairston-v-state-texapp-2017.