Dunwoody v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.
78 A. 211, 80 N.J.L. 461, 51 Vroom 461, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 237
Opinion
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Teenoitard, Parker, Yooehees, Bogeet, Yre-DENBUEGH, YROOM, DlLL, CONGDON, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunwoody v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 78 A. 211, 80 N.J.L. 461, 51 Vroom 461, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1910).
78 A. 211 (Dunwoody v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.