Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Dunwoody v. Goldfarb

Dunwoody v. Goldfarb

110 N.J. Eq. 65
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 1, 1932·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 107 N. J. Eq. 270.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunwoody v. Goldfarb, 110 N.J. Eq. 65 (N.J. 1932).

110 N.J. Eq. 65 (Dunwoody v. Goldfarb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.