Dunston v. Dunston

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Dunston v. Dunston

553 So. 2d 127, 1989 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 258, 1989 WL 89570

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided August 9, 1989·No. Civ. 6969·Published

Opinion

RUSSELL, Judge.

Appellants appeal to this court, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order them to pay certain monies. However, the one case cited in their brief does not support their argument.

In view of the above, we find that the appellants failed to comply with Rule 28, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure. Where the appellant fails to cite any authority supporting its argument, this court is precluded from considering the issues presented and has no alternative but to affirm. Barnhill v. Barnhill, 516 So.2d 725 (Ala.Civ.App.1987).

AFFIRMED.

INGRAM, P.J., and ROBERTSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RUSSELL, Judge.

Appellants appeal to this court, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order them to pay certain monies. However, the one case cited in their brief does not support their argument.

In view of the above, we find that the appellants failed to comply with Rule 28, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure. Where the appellant fails to cite any authority supporting its argument, this court is precluded from considering the issues presented and has no alternative but to affirm. Barnhill v. Barnhill, 516 So.2d 725 (Ala.Civ.App.1987).

AFFIRMED.

INGRAM, P.J., and ROBERTSON, J., concur.

Dunston v. Dunston, 553 So. 2d 127, 1989 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 258, 1989 WL 89570 (Ala. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

553 So. 2d 127 (Dunston v. Dunston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related