Dunston v. Dunston
This text of 553 So. 2d 127 (Dunston v. Dunston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants appeal to this court, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order them to pay certain monies. However, the one case cited in their brief does not support their argument.
In view of the above, we find that the appellants failed to comply with Rule 28, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure. Where the appellant fails to cite any authority supporting its argument, this court is precluded from considering the issues presented and has no alternative but to affirm. Barnhill v. Barnhill, 516 So.2d 725 (Ala.Civ.App.1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
553 So. 2d 127, 1989 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 258, 1989 WL 89570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunston-v-dunston-alacivapp-1989.