Dunstan v. Tompkins Implement Co.

530 S.W.3d 645
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 24, 2017
DocketWD 80292
StatusPublished

This text of 530 S.W.3d 645 (Dunstan v. Tompkins Implement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunstan v. Tompkins Implement Co., 530 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Dunstan appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Miller County in favor of Tompkins Implement Company on his claim brought under Missouri’s Merchandising Practices Act. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 S.W.3d 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunstan-v-tompkins-implement-co-moctapp-2017.