Dunscombe v. Sayle
340 F.2d 311
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 13, 1965·No. No. 21592·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
As announced from the bench, this appeal is dismissed. It is patently a frivolous appeal. Double costs are awarded the appellee as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1912.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunscombe v. Sayle, 340 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1965).
340 F.2d 311 (Dunscombe v. Sayle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coghlan v. Starkey
852 F.2d 806 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Kenneth L. Waters v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
764 F.2d 1389 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
John M. Hagerty v. Succession of Laura McCloskey Clement
749 F.2d 217 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
State of Texas v. Gulf Water Benefaction Co. And Robert E. Pine, Individually and in His Proper Capacity as Trustee, Etc.
679 F.2d 85 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
The Dow Chemical Company v. M/v Gulf Seas, Its Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Gulf Mississippi Marine Corporation
593 F.2d 613 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp.
78 F.R.D. 192 (E.D. Louisiana, 1978)
Dan J. Sheehan Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, and John T. Dunlop,secretary of Labor
520 F.2d 1036 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)