Dunope v. Arcelormittal Steel
This text of 569 F. App'x 148 (Dunope v. Arcelormittal Steel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary Ann Dunope appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint alleging employment discrimination claims under the ADA and ERISA violations and denying her motion to alter or amend the dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunope v. Arcelor-Mittal S.A., No. 5:13-cv-00058-JPB-JES [149]*149(N.D.W.Va. Aug. 14 & Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 F. App'x 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunope-v-arcelormittal-steel-ca4-2014.