Dunope v. Arcelormittal Steel

Fourth Circuit

Dunope v. Arcelormittal Steel

569 F. App'x 148

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-2272·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Dunope appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint alleging employment discrimination claims under the ADA and ERISA violations and denying her motion to alter or amend the dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunope v. Arcelor-Mittal S.A., No. 5:13-cv-00058-JPB-JES [149] (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 14 & Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Dunope appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint alleging employment discrimination claims under the ADA and ERISA violations and denying her motion to alter or amend the dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunope v. Arcelor-Mittal S.A., No. 5:13-cv-00058-JPB-JES [149] (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 14 & Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dunope v. Arcelormittal Steel, 569 F. App'x 148 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

569 F. App'x 148 (Dunope v. Arcelormittal Steel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.