Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 372

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 13, 1959

DocketNo. 63039; protest 327635-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 372 (Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 372 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise involved consists of a Mercedes Benz automobile imported as unaccompanied baggage for the account of a nonresident of the United States; that the collector assessed duty on said automobile for the reason that the record showing the arrival of the nonresident in the United States had not been located; that such record has now been established; and that the automobile is properly entitled to free entry, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise involved consists of a Mercedes Benz automobile imported as unaccompanied baggage for the account of a nonresident of the United States; that the collector assessed duty on said automobile for the reason that the record showing the arrival of the nonresident in the United States had not been located; that such record has now been established; and that the automobile is properly entitled to free entry, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunnington-arnold-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1959.