Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 397

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 21, 1955

DocketReap. Dec. 8472; Entry No. 702202

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 397 (Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 397 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

La whence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party.

Pursuant to rule 5 of the rules of this court, I have examined the record in the appeal presently before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. Therefore, I find and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

La whence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party.

Pursuant to rule 5 of the rules of this court, I have examined the record in the appeal presently before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. Therefore, I find and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Cust. Ct. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunnington-arnold-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.