Dunning v. State
366 S.W.3d 83, 2012 WL 1623561, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 619
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Rex P. Dunning, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dunning v. State, 366 S.W.3d 83, 2012 WL 1623561, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 619 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
366 S.W.3d 83 (Dunning v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SOMMERICH v. Target Corp.
366 S.W.3d 83 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)