Dunning v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dunning v. State

366 S.W.3d 83, 2012 WL 1623561, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 619

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2012

DocketED 96884

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 S.W.3d 83 (Dunning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunning v. State, 366 S.W.3d 83, 2012 WL 1623561, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 619 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Rex P. Dunning, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Rex P. Dunning, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 S.W.3d 83, 2012 WL 1623561, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunning-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack