Dunning v. New Albany & Salem Railroad

2 Ind. 437
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Ind. 437 (Dunning v. New Albany & Salem Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunning v. New Albany & Salem Railroad, 2 Ind. 437 (Ind. 1850).

Opinion

ASSUMPSIT by a corporation on a subscription of stock. Plea — general issue. Judgment for the plaintiff. The plea of general issue admits the capacity of the plaintiff to sue. Guaga Company v. Dawson, 4 Blackf. [438]*438202. — Harris v. Muskingum Co. id. 267. The Court takes notice officially of the public proclamations of the Governor. 1 Greenl. Ev. 65.

C. Dewey, for the plaintiff. R. Crawford, for the defendant.

Every presumption is indulged in favor of the legal existence of a corporation after it has gone into operation. Ang. & Ames on Corp. 506.

The judgment is affirmed on the weight of evidence, with costs, and 1 per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cicero Hygiene Draining Co. v. Craighead
28 Ind. 274 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ind. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunning-v-new-albany-salem-railroad-ind-1850.