Dunnell v. Schaefer Division of Studebaker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Dunnell v. Schaefer Division of Studebaker

198 N.W.2d 339, 293 Minn. 517, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1269

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 9, 1972·No. No. 43305·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding employee compensation and medical benefits.

Relators challenge the commission’s findings of disability for specific periods.

No purpose would be served in restating the facts on this appeal. It is sufficient that upon a careful review of the proceedings herein, it is the opinion of the court that the findings of the commission of disability and medical expenses of the employee are supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.

Respondent is hereby allowed attorneys’ fees of $400.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding employee compensation and medical benefits.

Relators challenge the commission’s findings of disability for specific periods.

No purpose would be served in restating the facts on this appeal. It is sufficient that upon a careful review of the proceedings herein, it is the opinion of the court that the findings of the commission of disability and medical expenses of the employee are supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.

Respondent is hereby allowed attorneys’ fees of $400.

Affirmed.

Dunnell v. Schaefer Division of Studebaker, 198 N.W.2d 339, 293 Minn. 517, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1269 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

198 N.W.2d 339 (Dunnell v. Schaefer Division of Studebaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.