Dunne v. Young

16 N.Y.S. 957, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 956, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 654
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJanuary 4, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.Y.S. 957 (Dunne v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunne v. Young, 16 N.Y.S. 957, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 956, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 654 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought upon a written contract, and of course the burden of showing the fulfillment of it according to its terms was upon the plaintiff. The defense relied upon was that the plaintiff neglected the business, was incompetent to do the work which he undertook to do, and that it became necessary for the defendant to hire another man to do part of his work. It is true that the plaintiff contradicts this testimony upon these points, but this makes it a question of conflict of evidence merely; and, as there is enough to sustain the finding of the court below upon these questions, we think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.Y.S. 957, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 956, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunne-v-young-nyctcompl-1892.