Dunne v. West Chicago Park Commissioners

42 N.E. 375, 159 Ill. 60
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 1895·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It is agreed by counsel for each party to this cause that the record is a substantial, if not a literal, copy of the one filed in Derby v. West Chicago Park Comrs. 154 Ill. 213. No question is raised here which was not raised and decided in the Derby case, and it is conceded by counsel that the opinion there rendered must control bere. It is sufficient, therefore, to refer to the opinion in that case for a statement of the reasons upon which our -decision of the case at bar is based. As in the Derby case, the judgment of confirmation as to plaintiffs in error in the case at bar, and as to their lands, is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunne v. West Chicago Park Commissioners, 42 N.E. 375, 159 Ill. 60 (Ill. 1895).

42 N.E. 375 (Dunne v. West Chicago Park Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Derby v. West Chicago Park Commissioners
40 N.E. 438 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)